With a monolithic deployment, you have to scale the entire server even if it is only for a specific application
Even small changes require rebuilding and redeploying the entire application, which is inefficient.
Is time-consuming, error-prone, and inefficient
An error in any application can potentially bring down the entire server
Tightly coupled components can make it difficult to change or replace parts of the application
Multiple technologies require multiple of deployment on various servers
Organizations must manually handle events like server/application crashes, which is an operational burden.
Each microservice might have its own logging system and format, making it difficult to trace issues that span over multiple services
Organizations might struggle with the complexity of deploying, managing, and scaling a microservices architecture.
Deployments done manually increases the risk of errors and deployment failures
Resources are not efficiently managed manually, which is a major contributor for Increased costs.
With a monolithic deployments, you have to scale the entire server even if it is only for a specific application
Even small changes require rebuilding and redeploying the entire application, which is inefficient.
Is time-consuming, error-prone, and inefficient
An error in any application can potentially bring down the entire server
Tightly coupled components can make it difficult to change or replace parts of the application
Multiple technologies require multiple of deployment on various servers
Organizations must manually handle events like server/application crashes, which is an operational burden.v
Each microservice might have its own logging system and format, making it difficult to trace issues that span over multiple services
Organizations might struggle with the complexity of deploying, managing, and scaling a microservices architecture.
Deployments done manually increases the risk of errors and deployment failures
Resources are not efficiently managed manually, which is a major contributor for Increased costs.
With a monolithic deployments, you have to scale the entire server even if it is only for a specific application
Even small changes require rebuilding and redeploying the entire application, which is inefficient.
Is time-consuming, error-prone, and inefficient
An error in any application can potentially bring down the entire server
Tightly coupled components can make it difficult to change or replace parts of the application
Multiple technologies require multiple of deployment on various servers
Organizations must manually handle events like server/application crashes, which is an operational burden.
Each microservice might have its own logging system and format, making it difficult to trace issues that span over multiple services
Organizations might struggle with the complexity of deploying, managing, and scaling a microservices architecture.
Deployments done manually increases the risk of errors and deployment failures
Resources are not efficiently managed manually, which is a major contributor for Increased costs.
With monolithic deployments, you have to scale the entire server even if it is only for a specific application
Even small changes require rebuilding and redeploying the entire application, which is inefficient.
Is time-consuming, error-prone, and inefficient
An error in any application can potentially bring down the entire server
Tightly coupled components can make it difficult to change or replace parts of the application
Multiple technologies require multiple of deployment on various servers
Organizations must manually handle events like server/application crashes, which is an operational burden.
Each microservice might have its own logging system and format, making it difficult to trace issues that span over multiple services
Organizations might struggle with the complexity of deploying, managing, and scaling a microservices architecture.
Deployments done manually increases the risk of errors and deployment failures
Resources are not efficiently managed manually, which is a major contributor for Increased costs.
Confixa automates routine tasks, freeing teams to innovate, minimize firefighting, and empower developer creativity.
One-click deployment, rapid parallel pipelines, and dynamic scaling enhance release speed, testing, and performance.
Guardrails ensure consistency, minimize defects, while phased rollout and visibility enhance release confidence.
Optimize your software operations, reduce costs, and accelerate deployments with our highly trained DevOps engineers– no need for an in-house team
Swift onboarding, continuous 24/7 DevOps support, proactive partners, roadmap influence, extensive training your cloud-native advisors.
Simplify with Confixa's interface, integrating all enterprise needs, reducing sprawl and patchwork solutions.
Seamless link: infrastructure, CI/CD, monitoring; holistic context enables optimization. Confixa covers end-to-end, closing code-customer gaps.